ScopeGate vs LiteLLM
LiteLLM ($20M+ estimated funding) is an open-source LLM proxy that unifies access to 100+ model providers. It recently added MCP support, but MCP permission management is not its core focus. ScopeGate is purpose-built for the MCP permission layer — controlling what agents can do, not which models they use.
Feature comparison
Winner in this category · Tie
Where ScopeGate wins
- Purpose-built for MCP permission control — not an afterthought on an LLM proxy
- Per-agent granular scoping for external services, not just LLM model access
- Instant cross-service revocation designed for MCP workflows
Where LiteLLM wins
- Excellent LLM routing and cost management across 100+ providers
- Mature spend analytics, budget controls, and model fallback logic
The verdict
LiteLLM and ScopeGate solve different problems. LiteLLM is the best choice for managing which LLM models your agents use and controlling spend. ScopeGate is the right tool for controlling what external services and scopes your MCP agents can access. Many teams use both together.
Who should pick which?
Teams that need to control what MCP agents can access in external services like Google, Slack, and GitHub.
Teams that need unified LLM routing, cost tracking, and model fallback across many providers.
Ready to try ScopeGate?
Free tier with 1 project, 5 endpoints, and 1K requests/month. Set up per-agent permissions in under 5 minutes.
View on GitHub