ScopeGate vs Composio
Composio ($29M Series A) is a broad AI agent integration platform offering 250+ pre-built connectors. It handles authentication, execution, and orchestration across many services. ScopeGate takes a deliberately narrower focus: it is a permission proxy layer for MCP endpoints, giving you granular control over what each agent can access without the complexity of a full integration platform.
Feature comparison
Winner in this category · Tie
Where ScopeGate wins
- Purpose-built permission layer — simpler mental model than a full integration platform
- Per-agent scope control is a first-class feature, not an afterthought
- Faster setup for MCP-specific use cases without unnecessary complexity
- Cross-service revocation designed into the core architecture
Where Composio wins
- 250+ pre-built integrations spanning REST, GraphQL, and MCP
- Full execution and orchestration capabilities beyond just permission control
The verdict
Composio is the right choice if you need a broad integration platform with hundreds of connectors and don't mind the added complexity. ScopeGate is better if your primary concern is controlling what your MCP agents can access — with less overhead and a sharper focus on permissions.
Who should pick which?
Teams focused on MCP permission control who value simplicity and a dedicated permission proxy.
Teams needing 250+ integrations across multiple protocols with built-in execution.
Ready to try ScopeGate?
Free tier with 1 project, 5 endpoints, and 1K requests/month. Set up per-agent permissions in under 5 minutes.
View on GitHub